Industries · Manufacturing & OT
Scanners and ASPM keep filling the industrial control queue. Engineers still rebuild the investigation for every ticket. UnitOne shortens the path from a prioritized finding to a reviewable, validated repair.
Remediation is a scoped engagement. Gateway is self-serve in your VPC, VNet, or GCP project.
Scanner and ASPM queues keep growing. You need a trail from a prioritized finding to a validated repair — not another dashboard.
Controllers, HMI/SCADA-adjacent apps, and embedded product lines with upgrade windows you cannot casually bump.
Industrial software companies that need a repeatable Finding → Fix Spec → PR path and CRA-style handling evidence across plants and product lines.
SCA, SAST, threat modeling, and compliance each run their own triage. Findings also land in ASPM — another queue — then become Jira tickets from any of those paths. Security needs exposure. Engineering needs change impact. Release needs a safe deploy. Useful information is spread across scanners, repos, runtime, and people. Someone has to reconnect it for every ticket.
AI industrialized discovery. Remediation capacity did not scale.
See the findings-queue path on the security remediation page — Finding → Fix Spec → PR is the scoped work a remediation POC covers. PE operating teams can use the PE portfolio security remediation playbook to run that model across companies.
“Discovery has been industrialized by AI, but remediation capacity has not scaled accordingly.”
We take a prioritized ArmorCode finding into the fixer, create or link the Jira ticket, and keep investigation evidence attached. The Fix Spec states the security condition to correct, the behavior to preserve, what may change, and the tests required to assess the repair. Those requirements map to pipeline steps and review evidence.
Proposed repair + required passing test evidence ready for review. Engineering owns merge and release.
Engineer still investigates or finishes the repair — but gets affected code, security context, and a clear blocker instead of a vague ticket.
Identifying tests is validation planning. Until required results exist for the proposed revision and environment, the repair is awaiting validation. Passing functional tests does not close a failed security check.
Long support lifetimes, release trains you cannot casually bump, and private networks change how remediation has to work.
Firmware and service code with constrained upgrade windows.
Apps that sit next to plant operations; changes need regression discipline.
Java/.NET/C++ product lines with dependency debt across releases.
Gateway and remediation evidence stay in your AWS, Azure, or GCP network. Outbound HTTPS only to the control plane.
Problem: Dependency upgrades stall while engineers re-prove reachability and blast radius.
What we do: Attach prior exposure evidence to the ticket; Fix Spec for package upgrade + API/behavior preserve + security regression and integration checks.
Problem: SAST/ASPM findings become tickets without a repair contract.
What we do: Locate affected code, define permitted change, produce candidate repair + validation plan; engineer reviews or finishes.
Problem: Reporting clocks and buyer questionnaires need a trail, not a scanner export.
What we do: Keep finding → decision → fix → verification linked; Gateway supports runtime evidence and spend caps in your network.
Stop poisoned tools, over-scoped access, and unsafe agent actions at runtime.
Keep logs you can export for vulnerability handling and Article 14-style duties.
See spend by agent, team, or project — and set caps.
Data plane with you. Policy, evidence views, and spend sync over outbound HTTPS. See architecture on the homepage or Gateway product page.
Short answers for this industry page. More Gateway questions are on the FAQ.
We’ll walk investigation, Fix Spec, and what a reviewable repair looks like for your industrial control or product stack.